Ms. Sheila Holm shares her Judicial Experience with San Diego Superior Court:

Alla Zorikova had wrote her book as well, and it is published and available for sale.
Corruption, control by criminals, infiltration by criminals of California governmental entities is all
in the OPEN, and can not be concealed any longer.
Alla Zorikova had submitted her reports to New USA FBI and DOJ.
It is threat that Alla Zorikova will be simply killed or jailed for exposing crimes if those criminals with "attorney license" or in black robes will not cease they "positions of power", that how they call "serving people" while being paid by taxpayers dollars.
Alla Zorikova has documented, undisputed FACTS based on personal knowledge in hands, which had been reported and published. All TRUE and ACCURATE!
​
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-10-19-mn-55614-story.html
​
2 Former Judges, Lawyer, convicted in Corruption
It appears that the incident you're referring to actually took place not in 1998, but in 1996. In October 1996, two former San Diego Superior Court judges—G. Dennis Adams and James Malkus—along with attorney Patrick R. Frega, were convicted (not merely suspended) on charges including conspiracy and racketeering, under federal law. The case involved them receiving gifts and favors in exchange for favorable treatment in court, raising serious corruption issues
Here’s the key breakdown:
-
Date & Location: The convictions occurred in October 1996 in federal court (not a “tribunal”).
-
Defendants:
-
Former Superior Court Judges G. Dennis Adams and James Malkus
-
Prominent civil attorney Patrick R. Frega
-
Another former judge, Michael I. Greer, had pleaded guilty and testified against them Los Angeles Times.
-
-
Charges:
-
Conspiracy to commit racketeering, in violation of the RICO statute.
-
Multiple counts of mail fraud.
-
-
Details:
-
The allegations included judges receiving gifts—such as car repairs, computers, jobs for relatives, automobiles—from Frega, and showing favoritism in handling his cases. Secret communications, clandestine meetings, and failure to disclose gifts were central to the case
-
https://archive.calbar.ca.gov/archive/calbar/2cbj/02mar/page23-1.htm
​
Former deputy DA, convicted of grand theft, is suspended
A former San Diego deputy district attorney was placed on interim suspension early this year after pleading guilty to one count of grand theft, a charge that resulted from conducting his real estate business out of his office. PETER JAMES LONGANBACH [#48988], 56, of Rancho Santa Fe, who once headed the DA's economic fraud unit, lost his license Jan. 7.
Longanbach quit his job two years ago after state investigators searched his home and office at the San Diego Hall of Justice as part of an investigation into his financial dealings.
Although he could have been sentenced to three years in prison, Longanbach was ordered last month to spend 350 hours teaching underprivileged children to play golf and to organize a charity golf tournament. San Diego Superior Court Judge Kenneth So also placed Longanbach on probation for three years and ordered him to spend one day in jail.
After a 17-month investigation by the attorney general, Longan-bach was indicted by a grand jury last year on 12 felony charges including misuse of public funds, grand theft and embezzlement. The investigation was launched when two secretaries complained he was forcing them to work on his personal business during work hours.
Transcripts of the grand jury testimony showed he used employees to type personal letters, prepare leases for rental properties and run errands. One secretary testified she sometimes spent between 50 and 75 percent of her work time on Longanbach's personal business. An avid golfer, he also was investigated for playing golf during work hours, but was never charged with that offense.
In a plea bargain reached with the attorney general, Longanbach wrote, "I used San Diego district attorney staff to prepare personal documents. I used San Diego district attorney's office fax, copy machine and telephone equipment for personal purposes, and I worked on private matters during district attorney office hours."
As part of the agreement, he will pay San Diego County $25,000 in restitution. The judge said he opted for probation rather than prison because Longanbach had never before been convicted of a crime.
Over the course of the investigation, 34 witnesses testified before the grand jury, most of them fellow employees.
The grand theft plea was the culmination of Longanbach's legal woes, which began following his successful prosecution of a 1996 murder trial. An appeals court overturned the defendant's second-degree murder conviction two years later, citing a legal error by the judge.
A second trial was held amid allegations by the defense attorney that Longanbach coached a key witness to lie. The witness admitted she perjured herself and Longanbach, called as a witness, took the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions.
The defendant was found guilty last year of the less serious charge of involuntary manslaughter by a second jury. He subsequently filed a federal lawsuit against Longanbach and the district attorney's office, charging that the former prosecutor engaged in criminal conduct to win a murder conviction.
As a result of the murder case, Longanbach became the subject of a separate criminal investigation by the attorney general.
In addition, a San Diego Superior Court judge ruled in 2000 that Longanbach committed prosecutorial misconduct in a 1998 grand theft and forgery case. Judge Judith Hayes said he "willfully violated both the spirit and the letter" of the law requiring disclosure of evidence.
Longanbach's name is playing a prominent role in this month's primary election for district attorney in San Diego, where Paul Pfingst, seeking a third four-year term, faces a challenge from three other candidates.
Pfingst's opponents say he failed to discipline Longanbach properly when allegations were made against him in 1998, pointing to the investigation that included a raid on the DA's downtown offices seeking evidence. In addition, they criticize Pfingst for giving Longanbach a raise when he knew about the secretaries' complaints.
​







